Elizabeth Dalgleish – Psychologist and Therapist.
Introduction
Suicide remains a major public health concern in Scotland, with persistent inequalities linked to gender, socioeconomic deprivation, and social isolation (SPICe, 2022). In response, the Scottish Government and COSLA introduced Creating Hope Together: Scotland’s Suicide Prevention Strategy 2022–2032, emphasising prevention, early intervention, and community-based responses (Scottish Government & COSLA, 2022). Although the strategy is non-statutory, it operates within a legislative and policy environment that shapes national responses to suicide.
For Christians and Christian communities, suicide prevention policy has particular significance. A substantial body of contemporary research supports an inverse relationship between religiosity and suicide risk. Studies have consistently demonstrated that higher levels of religious involvement, including Christianity, is associated with reduced suicidal ideation and behaviour (e.g. Caribe et al., 2012; Carli et al., 2014; Kleiman & Liu, 2014; Kralovec et al., 2014; Wu et al., 2015). Religious belief, however, can function as both a protective factor and a barrier to help-seeking, depending on how suicide and mental distress are understood within faith contexts (Leavey et al., 2007). This article explores how Scottish suicide prevention policy intersects with Christian theology, pastoral practice, and ethical concerns.
Suicide, Christianity, and Stigma
Historically, Christian theology has framed suicide as morally wrong, rooted in doctrines of the sanctity of life and divine sovereignty (Augustine, 1998; Aquinas, 1947). While many contemporary Christian denominations have moved toward more compassionate and psychologically informed understandings, elements of stigma persist within some faith communities (Collicutt, 2015).
Research indicates that religious stigma can discourage individuals from disclosing suicidal thoughts or seeking professional support, particularly where distress is interpreted as spiritual failure (Leavey et al., 2007). In the Scottish context, where Christianity continues to shape community life, this presents a challenge for suicide prevention efforts. The Creating Hope Together strategy’s explicit focus on reducing stigma and shame aligns with pastoral movements within Christianity that emphasise grace, compassion, and relational care (Scottish Government & COSLA, 2022). Indeed, Mason (2023) highlighted that safe, supportive faith communities can reduce stigma and encourage help-seeking.
Policy Context and Community Engagement
Scottish suicide prevention policy frames suicide as a preventable public health issue, rather than a moral or criminal act. Suicide has long been decriminalised in Scotland, a position that reduces fear and shame and supports help-seeking (SPICe, 2022). This framing can complement Christian ethical commitments to care for vulnerable individuals, though it may also sit uneasily with theological narratives that emphasise meaning-making in suffering (Swinton, 2018).
Churches are not statutory actors within suicide prevention policy, yet they are implicitly recognised as key community partners. Faith communities often function as trusted spaces of belonging and are frequently the first point of contact for individuals experiencing distress (Leavey et al., 2007). However, evidence suggests that clergy and lay leaders often feel under-prepared to respond to suicide risk, highlighting the need for training and collaboration with statutory services (Mason et al., 2021).
Assisted Dying and Ethical Tensions
The parliamentary debate in Scotland regarding assisted dying presented a significant ethical challenge for Christian communities. Many Christian organisations opposed legalisation on the grounds of the sanctity of life and concerns about safeguarding vulnerable individuals (CARE for Scotland, 2025). From a suicide prevention perspective, Keown (2018) warns that legalising assisted dying may introduce normative ambiguity by legitimising some forms of self-inflicted death, potentially undermining prevention messaging.
For Christians engaged in pastoral care, this debate complicates conversations around hope, suffering, and dignity, particularly for individuals experiencing existential distress. The tension underscores the need for clear ethical distinctions between suicide prevention and end-of-life care, alongside robust mental health and palliative support.
For more on this topic see our article on Assisted Dying here.
Pastoral Care and Prevention
Studies suggest that faith leaders are frequently approached first by individuals experiencing distress, yet many report feeling under-trained to respond safely to suicide risk (Leavey et al., 2007; Mason et al., 2021). The policy emphasis on training and community capacity building therefore has direct relevance for Christian ministers, chaplains, and lay leaders. The Scottish strategy’s recognition of lived experience and community voice offers scope for Christian communities to contribute constructively to suicide prevention while maintaining theological integrity.
Contemporary pastoral theology increasingly recognises suicide prevention as consistent with Christian commitments to accompaniment, compassion, and hope (Swinton, 2018). However, research on spiritual struggle suggests that religious distress, such as feeling abandoned by God or morally unworthy, can increase suicide risk (Exline et al., 2014). Effective suicide prevention within Christian contexts therefore requires addressing harmful theological narratives while encouraging timely referral to professional mental health services.
Conclusion
Scottish suicide prevention policy has important implications for Christians and Christian communities. While public health approaches reduce stigma and promote access to care, theological beliefs continue to shape how suicide is understood and responded to within faith contexts. The Creating Hope Together strategy, developed by the Scottish Goverenment, offers a framework in which churches can function as protective community resources, provided that appropriate training, partnership, and ethical reflection are in place. Ongoing legislative debates, particularly around assisted dying, highlight the need for sustained dialogue to ensure that suicide prevention efforts remain coherent, inclusive, and protective of vulnerable individuals.
References
Aquinas, T. (1947). Summa Theologica. Trans. Fathers of the English Dominican Province. Benziger Brothers. https://www.ccel.org/a/aquinas/summa/home.html
Augustine. (1998). The City of God against the Pagans. Trans. R. W. Dyson (Ed.). Cambridge University Press.
CARE for Scotland. (2025). Assisted suicide bill: Ethical and social concerns. CARE
Caribe, A. C. et al. (2012). Religiosity as a protective factor in suicidal behavior: A case-control study. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 200(10), 863-867 https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0b013e31826b6d05
Carli, V. et al. (2014). Serious suicidal behaviors: Socio-ethnographic and clinical
features in a multinational, multicenter sample. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 68(1), 44-52 https://soi.org/10.3109/08039488.2013.767934
Collicutt, M. (2015). The Psychology of Christian Character Formation. London:SCM Press
Exline, J. J., Pargament, K. I., Grubbs, J. B., & Yali, A. M. (2014). The religious and spiritual struggles scale. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 6(3), 208–222 https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036465
Keown, J. (2018). Euthanasia, ethics and public policy: An Argument Against Public Policy. Cambridge University Press
Kleiman, E. M. & Liu, R. T. (2014). Prospective prediction of suicide in a nationally representative sample: Religious service attendance as a protective factor. The British Journal of Psychiatry: The Journal of Mental Science, 204, 262-266 https://doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.113.128900
Kralovec, K. et al. (2014). Religion and suicide risk in lesbian, gay and bisexual Austrians. Journal of Religion and Health, 53(2), 413-423 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0268-4
Leavey, G, Loewenthal, K., & King, M. (2007). Challenges to sanctuary: the clergy as a resource for mental health care in the community. Journal of Social Science and Medicine, 65(3), 548-559 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17482330/
Mason, K., (2023). The Essentials of Suicide Prevention: A Blueprint for Churches. Cascade Books
Mason, K., Geist, M., Kuo, R., Marshall, D., & Wines, J. D. Jr. (2021). Clergy as Suicide Prevention Gatekeepers. Journal of Pastoral Care Counselling. 75(2):84-91 https://doi:10.1177/1542305020974997
Scottish Government & COSLA. (2022). Creating Hope Together: Scotland’s Suicide Prevention Strategy 2022–2032
SPICe. (2022). Suicide and self-harm in Scotland. Scottish Parliament https://bprcdn.parliament.scot/published/2022/7/6/7f2eaa6a-1f3d-4ad1-9543-361e085581f7/SB%2022-46.pdf
Swinton, J. (2018). Finding Jesus in the storm. London: SCM Press
Wu, A., Wang, J,-Y., & Jia, C,-X. (2015). Religion and completed suicide: A meta-analysis.
PLoS ONE, 10(6), e0131715 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131715